- NAAC
- Extended Profile
- Criteria 1-7
- DVV Clarification
- Best practices
- Institutional Distinctiveness
- Code of Conduct
- Disabled Friendly Campus
- Environmental Promotional Activities Beyond the Campus
- Annual Report for the Celebration & Events
- Capacty Building and Skills Enhancement
- Stake Holders Feedback Forms
- IQAC
NATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION COUNCIL (NAAC)
India has one of the largest and diverse education systems in the world. Privatization, widespread expansion, increased autonomy and introduction of Programmes in new and emerging areas have improved access to higher education. At the same time, it has also led to widespread concern on the quality and relevance of the higher education. To address these concerns, the National Policy on Education (NPE, 1986) and the Programme of Action (PoA, 1992) spelt out strategic plans for the policies, advocated the establishment of an independent National accreditation agency. Consequently, the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) was established in 1994 as an autonomous institution of the University Grants Commission (UGC) with its Head Quarter in Bengaluru. The mandate of NAAC as reflected in its vision statement is in making quality assurance an integral part of the functioning of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs).
The NAAC functions through its General Council (GC) and Executive Committee (EC) comprising educational administrators, policy makers and senior academicians from a cross-section of Indian higher education system. The Chairperson of the UGC is the President of the GC of the NAAC, the Chairperson of the EC is an eminent academician nominated by the President of GC (NAAC). The Director is the academic and administrative head of NAAC and is the member secretary of both the GC and the EC. In addition to the statutory bodies that steer its policies and core staff to support its activities NAAC is advised by the advisory and consultative committees constituted from time to time.
NAAC- EXTENDED PROFILE
Criteria 1-7
Criteria 1 - Curricular Aspects (75) |
||
1.1.1 |
The Institution ensures effective curriculum delivery through a well-planned and documented process |
10 |
1.1.2 |
The Institution adheres to the academic calendar including for the conduct of CIE |
5 |
1.1.3 |
5 |
|
1.2.1 |
10 |
|
1.2.2 |
Number of Add on /Certificate programs offered during the last five years |
10 |
1.2.3 |
10 |
|
1.3.1 |
10 |
|
1.3.2 |
10 |
|
1.3.3 |
10 |
|
1.4.1 |
10 |
|
1.4.2 |
10 |
Curricular Criteria 2 - Teaching Learning and Evaluation (225) |
||
2.1.1 |
20 |
|
2.1.2 |
Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories |
20 |
2.2.1 |
30 |
|
2.2.2 |
20 |
|
2.3.1 |
20 |
|
2.3.2 |
Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process. |
15 |
2.3.3 |
Ratio of mentor to students for academic and other related issues Department wise mentor mentees, mentees issues and action taken report |
15 |
2.4.1 |
Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years |
20 |
2.4.2 |
20 |
|
2.4.3 |
Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution |
20 |
2.5.1 |
Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode |
15 |
2.5.2 |
15 |
|
2.6.1 |
15 |
|
2.6.2 |
Attainment of programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution. |
15 |
2.6.3 |
30 |
|
2.7.1 |
60 |
Curricular Criteria 3 - Research, Innovations and Extension (120) |
||
3.1.1 |
5 |
|
3.1.2 |
5 |
|
3.1.3 |
5 |
|
3.2.1 |
5 |
|
3.2.2 |
5 |
|
3.3.1 |
Number of Ph.Ds. registered per eligible teacher during the last five years |
5 |
3.3.2 |
10 |
|
3.3.3 |
10 |
|
3.4.1 |
5 |
|
3.4.2 |
10 |
|
3.4.3 |
15 |
|
3.4.4 |
20 |
|
3.5.1 |
10 |
|
3.5.2 |
10 |
Criteria 4 - Infrastructure and Learning Resources (71) |
||
4.1.1 |
5 |
|
4.1.2 |
5 |
|
4.1.3 |
10 |
|
4.1.4 |
Average percentage of expenditure, excluding salary for infrastructure augmentation |
10 |
4.2.1 |
Library is automated using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS) |
4 |
4.2.2 |
The institution has subscription for e-resources
|
6 |
4.2.3 |
Average annual expenditure for purchase of books/e-books and subscription to journals/e- journals |
5 |
4.2.4 |
Percentage per day usage of library by teachers and students |
5 |
4.3.1 |
Institution frequently updates its IT facilities including Wi-Fi |
5 |
4.3.2 |
10 |
|
4.3.3 |
15 |
|
4.4.1 |
10 |
|
4.4.2 |
10 |
Criteria 5 - Student Support and Progression (130) |
||
5.1.1 |
Average percentage of students benefited by scholarships and free ships provided by the Government |
20 |
5.1.2 |
5 |
|
5.1.3 |
Capacity building and skills enhancement initiatives taken by the institution |
10 |
5.1.4 |
10 |
|
5.1.5 |
5 |
|
5.2.1 |
10 |
|
5.2.2 |
Average percentage of students progressing to higher education |
10 |
5.2.3 |
Average percentage of students qualifying in state / national / international level examinations |
5 |
5.3.1 |
Number of awards/medals for outstanding performance in sports/cultural activities |
20 |
5.3.2 |
5 |
|
5.3.3 |
20 |
|
5.4.1 |
5 |
|
5.4.2 |
Alumni contribution during the last five years (INR in Lakhs) | 5 |
Criteria 6 - Governances, Leadership and Management (92) |
||
6.1.1 |
5 |
|
6.1.2 |
5 |
|
6.2.1 |
The institutional Strategic/ perspective plan is effectively deployed |
2 |
6.2.2 |
4 |
|
6.2.3 |
4 |
|
6.3.1 |
5 |
|
6.3.2 |
10 |
|
6.3.3 |
5 |
|
6.3.4 |
Average percentage of teachers undergoing online/ face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes (FDP) |
5 |
6.3.5 |
Institutions Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff |
5 |
6.4.1 |
Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly |
6 |
6.4.3 |
Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources |
6 |
6.5.1 |
10 |
|
6.5.2 |
10 |
|
6.5.3 |
10 |
DVV Clarification
Best Practices
Institutional Distinctiveness
Code of Conduct
Disabled Friendly Campus
Environmental promotional activities beyond the campus
Annual Report for the Celebration & Events
Capacty Building and Skills Enhancement
Stake Holders Feedback Forms
Students |
|
Faculty |
|
Alumni |
|
Employer |
|
Sample feedback Form |
Feedback Analysis
Students |
|
Faculty |
|
Alumni |
|
Employer |
|
Action Taken Report |